The Commission is preparing to adopt implementing and delegated acts
in order to allow for a timely inclusion of the shipping sector in
the EU ETS. These acts, which will be published by the end of 2023,
will define all the necessary rules, templates, and methods to
ensure the good functioning of the system from 1 January 2024.
For instance, they concern the administration of shipping companies
by administering authorities, the creation of maritime accounts in
the Union
Registry, specific rules in relation to monitoring,
reporting and verification.
However, for an EU act to apply to the EEA EFTA States (Iceland,
Liechtenstein and Norway), the EEA Joint Committee must adopt a
Decision to incorporate the act into the EEA Agreement. Regarding
the revised ETS Directive and MRV Maritime Regulation, this decision
is pending. The aim is to incorporate acts as soon as possible after
their date of entry into force in the EU, in order to ensure that
the same rules apply throughout the EEA.
The system is flag-neutral and route-based. This means it covers
emissions from maritime transport as follows:
100% of emissions from ships performing voyages
departing from a port under the jurisdiction of an EU Member
State [see question on EEA countries above for more information]
and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of an EU Member
State (e.g. Hamburg to Marseille and Marseille to Hamburg);
100% of emissions from ships within a port under
the jurisdiction of an EU Member State (e.g. in the port of
Antwerp), i.e. emissions released at berth and during movements
within such a port;
50% of emissions from ships performing voyages
departing from a port under the jurisdiction of an EU Member
State and arriving at a port outside its jurisdiction (e.g.
Rotterdam to Shanghai);
50% of the emissions from ships performing voyages
departing from a port outside the jurisdiction of an EU Member
State and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of an EU
Member State (e.g. Shanghai to Rotterdam).
Some derogations will apply, for instance for certain voyages to
outermost regions or some small islands, or to the benefit of ships
using renewable fuels. [see sections on ‘Specific rules and
derogations’ and ‘Biofuels and other alternative fuels’ below for
more information].
A port of call is the port where a ship stops to load or unload
cargo, to embark or disembark passengers, or where an offshore ship
stops to relieve the crew. The following stops are excluded:
stops for the sole purposes of refuelling,
stops for obtaining supplies,
stops for relieving the crew (other than an
offshore ship),
stops for going into dry-dock or making repairs to
the ship and/or its equipment,
stops in port because the ship is in need of
assistance or in distress,
ship-to-ship transfers carried out outside ports,
stops for the sole purpose of taking shelter from
adverse weather or rendered necessary by search and rescue
activities,
stops of containerships in the neighbouring
container transhipment ports listed in the implementing act to
be adopted by the end of 2023.
A reporting period is the period from 1 January until 31 December of
any given calendar year. Hence, for voyages starting and ending in
two different calendar years, the respective data must be accounted
under each reporting period. Following the example above, this means
that the amount of emissions until 31 December 2024, as monitored by
the shipping company, will be reported as part of the 2024 emissions
report, while the amount of emissions corresponding to the part of
the voyage as of 1 January 2025 will be accounted for in the 2025
emissions report.
No. Shipping companies will need to surrender (use) EU allowances
(EUA) corresponding to the amount of aggregated emissions data at
company level to be reported under the EU ETS Directive. Carbon
credits or certificates cannot be used for EU ETS compliance
purposes.
Yes. The European Commission aims to provide sector-specific rules
and templates in relevant implementing and delegated acts to be
adopted by the end of 2023, in order to ensure uniform
implementation of the EU ETS and MRV rules. In particular, new
templates for monitoring plans, emissions reports and reports at
company level will be provided.
The EU
Emissions Trading System (ETS) is a ‘cap-and-trade’ system.
A cap
is a threshold, defining the total amount of greenhouse gases that
can be emitted by the operators covered by the system. It is reduced
annually, at fixed intervals, in line with the EU’s climate target.
The ETS objective is to reduce emissions by 62% from 2005 to 2030.
The cap is expressed in emission allowances, where one allowance
gives the right to emit one tonne of CO2eq (carbon dioxide
equivalent). Operators are not allowed to generate more greenhouse
gas emissions than their allowances can cover. If they do, heavy
fines are imposed. Companies covered by the EU ETS must surrender
(use) EU allowances corresponding to their emissions in the Union
Registry. For instance, if a company emits 10,000 tonnes of
CO2 falling within the scope of the EU ETS Directive
during a reporting
period, that company needs to buy and surrender 10,000 allowances by
30 September of the following year. Emission allowances are
auctioned, and companies can buy and sell them through secondary
markets.
The system allows flexibility for companies to cut their emissions
in the most cost-effective way. Indeed, every year, companies are
incentivised to reduce their emissions or to continue to pay for
those emissions (i.e. to surrender the corresponding amount of
allowances).
Shipping companies covered by the EU ETS are required to have an
approved monitoring plan for monitoring and reporting annual
emissions. Every year, companies must submit an emissions report for
each of the ship under their responsibility, as well an emissions
report at company level (aggregating the ship data to be reported
for ETS purposes). The data for a given year must be verified by an
accredited verifier by 31 March of the following year (or by 28
February if so requested by the administering authority). Once
verified, companies must surrender (use) the equivalent number of
allowances by 30 September of that year.
Shipping companies are subject to obligations under the MRV
Regulation since 2018. Data must be reported through THETIS-MRV,
a platform operated by the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
which enables, among other benefits, the publication of reliable
data on ships’ emissions.
Please find more information in the FAQ on the MRV Maritime
Regulation.
Yes, shipping companies must continue reporting their greenhouse gas
emissions through the existing THETIS-MRV platform. The latter will
be updated in order to reflect the changes made by the revised MRV
Maritime Regulation and ETS Directive. On the basis of the reported
aggregated emissions data at company level, companies will then be
required to surrender (use) a corresponding amount of EU allowances
in the Union Registry.
Buy and Surrender EU allowances in the Union Registry
Shipping companies will need to surrender allowances in the EU
Member State corresponding to their administering authority. For
this purpose, shipping companies will need to open a Maritime
Operator Holding Account in that EU Member State.
[see questions on ‘Administering authorities’ for more information
about the rules to associate companies with the administering
authority of one EU Member State]
Emission allowances can be purchased in the primary market through
auctions
on the European
Energy Exchange (EEX), which is currently contracted by the
EU and its EU Member States to manage this system. There is also a
secondary market in which allowances can be sold bilaterally or
through various derivatives provided by financial institutions. To
purchase ETS allowances, companies need to open a trading account or
a maritime operator holding account in the Union Registry. Please
note that the latter option will not be available before 2024.
Shipping companies may already start buying EU allowances by opening
trading accounts in the Union Registry. According to the provisions
of the Union
Registry Regulation on the opening of a trading account, a
shipping company could request the opening of such an account to a
national administrator provided that it fulfills the conditions and
provides all the necessary information as required by the national
administrator. Furthermore, shipping companies may already start
buying EU allowances by various derivatives, such as futures.
The process for opening trading accounts takes place online and is
open to non-EU citizens, subject to conditions spelled out by each
EU Member State (through their National Administrator). Users must
first open an account in the Union Registry to be able to trade EU
allowances.
EU allowances (EUA) issued on or after 2013 do not expire and may be
banked for future years. However, an allowance that has been
surrendered cannot be retrieved.
The shipping company is defined as ‘the shipowner or any other
organisation or person, such as the manager or the bareboat
charterer, that has assumed the responsibility for the operation of
the ship from the shipowner and that, on assuming such
responsibility, has agreed to take over all the duties and
responsibilities imposed by the International Management Code for
the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, set out in
Annex I to Regulation
(EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
Council.’
In case the responsibility for the purchase of the fuel and/or the
operation of the ship is assumed by an entity other than the
shipping company pursuant to a contractual arrangement, the shipping
company is entitled to reimbursement from that entity for the costs
arising from the surrendering of allowances. EU Member States must
take national measures to ensure that the shipping company is
entitled to reimbursement in such situations and must provide the
corresponding access to justice to enforce that entitlement.
Although this entitlement to reimbursement should be made effective
by EU Member States regardless of contractual arrangements, shipping
companies and entities responsible for the purchase of the fuel
and/or the operation of the ship are expected to develop contractual
clauses to pass on the ETS surrendering costs as appropriate.
‘Operation of the ship’ for the purposes of this provision means
determining the cargo carried or the route and the speed of the
ship.
Nevertheless, the shipping company remains the responsible entity
for surrendering allowances.
Companies must, for each ship under their responsibility (at the end
of the reporting period), submit an emissions report for the entire
reporting period of the previous year, which has been verified as
satisfactory by a verifier. This is true regardless of company
changes and of who is responsible for surrendering allowances for
these emissions [see the question below for more information on the
surrendering]. The emissions report should cover the whole reporting
period: for the period of the year during which the ship was under
the responsibility of another company, the report would be based on
the partial emissions report submitted by that previous company.
The shipping company is responsible for surrendering allowances
corresponding to emissions from their ships during the time they
were under their responsibility. This means that if there is a
change of shipping company from Company A to Company B on 1 April
2025, then in 2026, Company A will need to surrender allowances
corresponding to emissions from that ship from 1 January to 1 April
2025 [see Article 11(2) of the MRV Maritime Regulation for further
details].
Each company will be associated with the administering authority of
one EU Member State. By 1 February 2024, and every two years
thereafter, the Commission will publish a list attributing each
company to the administering of one EU Member State. It will be done
in accordance with the rules spelled out in the EU ETS Directive,
i.e.:
in the case of a shipping company registered in an
EU Member State, it will be the EU Member State in which the
shipping company is registered;
in the case of a shipping company that is not
registered in an EU Member State, it will be the EU Member State
with the greatest estimated number of port calls from voyages
performed by that shipping company in the last four monitoring
years;
in the case of a shipping company that is not
registered in an EU Member State and that did not carry out any
voyage falling within the scope of the EU ETS Directive in the
preceding four monitoring years, the administering authority
will be the EU Member State where a ship of the shipping company
has arrived or started its first voyage falling within the scope
of the EU ETS Directive.
In case of a new shipping company not yet listed in the Commission’s
published list, the rules spelled out in Article 3gf of the EU ETS
Directive shall apply [see the above question]. This means that, on
the basis of these rules, companies will be able to identify which
is their administering authority. The THETIS-MRV helpdesk will
assist the company in assigning its responsible administering
authority in the system. The company will then be added to the list
at its next update, which happens every two years.
The revised EU ETS provides for dedicated support to accelerate the
decarbonization of the maritime sector through the Innovation
Fund. According to the Commission, 20 million allowances
(i.e. about €1.6 billion with a price of €80 per allowance) should
be deployed up to 2030 via the Innovation Fund to support the
decarbonization of the sector, notably through dedicated topics in
future calls for proposals. The Innovation Fund could support a wide
diversity of projects and innovative solutions in the maritime
sector, across the whole sector and at scale, including in relation
to the production and uptake of renewable and low-carbon fuels.
Besides the Innovation Fund, all auction revenues attributed to EU
Member States have to be used for climate-related purposes; and the
list of these purposes has been expanded to explicitly cover
measures to decarbonize the maritime sector. The list also includes
the financing of climate action in vulnerable third countries,
including adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
Companies that fail to surrender allowances are liable to an excess
emissions penalty of EUR 100 (corrected for inflation) per tonne of
CO2 equivalent, and are still liable for the surrender of
the required allowances. Names of the penalised companies are also
disclosed to the public.
EU Member States may set out additional penalties that are
effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Furthermore, in case a shipping company has failed to comply with
surrendering obligations for two or more consecutive reporting
periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure
compliance, the competent authority of the EU Member State of the
port of entry may, after giving the opportunity to the company
concerned to submit its observations, issue an expulsion order. In
practice, it means that every EU Member State is required to refuse
entry to the ships under the responsibility of the shipping company
concerned into any of its ports, until the company fulfils its
surrender obligations. Where a ship flies the flag of an EU Member
State and enters or is found in one of its ports, the EU Member
State concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company
concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the
company fulfils its obligations.
Administering authorities will ensure that all companies under their
responsibility surrender sufficient allowances in due time.
Information about the compliance status of regulated entities will
be derived from the Union Registry and be made accessible to the
relevant authorities.
The revised EU ETS provides for dedicated support to accelerate the
decarbonization of the maritime sector through the Innovation
Fund. According to the Commission, 20 million allowances
(i.e. about €1.6 billion with a price of €80 per allowance) should
be deployed up to 2030 via the Innovation Fund to support the
decarbonization of the sector, notably through dedicated topics in
future calls for proposals. The Innovation Fund could support a wide
diversity of projects and innovative solutions in the maritime
sector, across the whole sector and at scale, including in relation
to the production and uptake of renewable and low-carbon fuels.
Besides the Innovation Fund, all auction revenues attributed to EU
Member States have to be used for climate-related purposes; and the
list of these purposes has been expanded to explicitly cover
measures to decarbonize the maritime sector. The list also includes
the financing of climate action in vulnerable third countries,
including adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
Emissions from all ships covered by the EU ETS are treated in the
same way. However, ships of ice class IA, IA Super or an equivalent
ice class, established based on recommendation of the Baltic Marine
Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), may surrender 5%
fewer allowances than their verified emissions released until 31
December 2030. The reason for the difference in treatment is that
such ships, due to their design, require more fuel to cover the same
distance when traveling in the open sea or under ice conditions.
Yes. Until 31 December 2030, shipping companies must not surrender
allowances for emissions released by passenger ships, other than
cruise passenger ships, and by ferries (ro-pax ships), between a
port of an island under the jurisdiction of an EU Member State, with
no road or rail link with the mainland, and a port under the
jurisdiction of that same EU Member State. This derogation can only
apply, upon request of each EU Member State, to islands with a
population of fewer than 200 000 permanent residents. The list of
ports will be published by the end of 2023.
Yes. Until 31 December 2030, shipping companies must not surrender
allowances for emissions released from voyages between a port
located in an outermost region of an EU Member State and a port
located in the same EU Member State (e.g. Lanzarote-Valencia),
including voyages between ports within an outermost region (e.g.
Lanzarote-Fuerteventura) and voyages between ports in the outermost
regions of the same EU Member State (Guadeloupe-Martinique). These
exemptions include emissions within these ports in relation to such
voyages.
In case of transnational public service obligations (or
transnational public service contracts) established by two EU Member
States, one having no land border with another EU Member State and
the other being the closest, shipping companies must not surrender
allowances for emissions released by passenger ships or ferries
(ro-pax ships) operating under such a public service obligation
until 31 December 2030. The list of concerned route(s) will be
published by the end of 2023.
The obligation to monitor and report emissions as per the EU MRV
Maritime Regulation is still valid, even if all voyages from the
ships under the company’s responsibility fall within the scope of a
derogation as provided for in Article 12 of the EU ETS Directive.
These derogations only have impacts on the surrendering obligations.
By 31 December 2023 and every two years thereafter, the Commission
will publish an implementing act on neighbouring container
transhipment ports. Stops of containerships in the identified ports
should not be considered as port of calls for the purposes of the
MRV Maritime Regulation and ETS Directive.
A port will be considered a ‘neighbouring container transhipment
port’ when its share of transhipment of containers exceeds 65% of
its total container traffic and when that port is located outside
the Union but less than 300 nautical miles from a port under the
jurisdiction of an EU Member State. A port will not be considered a
‘neighbouring container transhipment port’ if it is located in a
third country for which that third country effectively applies
measures equivalent to the ETS Directive.
We provide comprehensive services tailored to the dynamic and evolving landscape of Emission Trading
Systems in Maritime. Our mission is to help shipping companies navigate the complexities of the
environmental products trading, reduce their carbon footprint, ensure compliance while optimizing
their operations.